This is a follow up post, for part 1 go here.
Now to discus this Enmerkar in more detail. He's second only to
Gilgamesh among the heroes of ancient Sumerian literature. Gilgamesh is
also of the same Dynasty, a generation or two later.
In Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta
a previous confusion of the languages of mankind is mentioned. This
agrees with the Biblical conclusion I came to earlier, Nimrod didn't
instigate Babel (at least not originally) but came sometime later,
though definitely still when it was a fairly recent memory. Aside from
founding Uruk, Enmerkar is said here to have had a temple built at
Eridu, and is even credited with the invention of writing on clay
tablets, for the purpose of threatening Aratta into submission. Enmerkar
furthermore seeks to restore the disrupted linguistic unity of the
inhabited regions around Uruk, listed as Shubur, Hamazi, Sumer, Uri-ki
(the region around Akkad), and the Martu land.
This, and the
other three major legends about Enmerkar chiefly revolve around his
conflict with a Kingdom called Aratta, and it's ruler En-suhgir-ana.
Aratta obviously sounds a lot like Ararat, but most scholars won't
connect them because they are used to the traditional identification of
Ararat referring to a mountain in Turkey, and these texts clearly seem
to place Aratta in northern Iran.
But Bob Conruke has shown that The Bible clearly places Ararat in northern Iran.
http://www.baseinstitute.org/pages/noahs_ark/17
He even addresses the connection between Ararat and Armenia.
From Genesis 10 and other sources referenced in Bill Cooper's After The Flood
this region is indeed likely to be one of the earliest major
settlements of Japheth's descendants (Gomer and Madai chiefly). Some
Rabbinical traditions (like the so called book of Jasher from medieval times), suggest there was a war or conflict between
Nimrod and Japheth (or Japheth's descendants).
According to the ancient Armenian historian Moses of Khorene and Georgian historian Leonti Mroveli. Hayk was a Son of Togarmah son of Gomer son of Japheth who founded Armenia and inherited Arrarat. Hayk is said to have fought wars with a Mesopotamian king named Bel who is sometimes identified with Nimrod. Though to the Greeks Belus was the father of Ninus.
Enmerkar's
successor was Lugalbanda, who appears in the narratives about Enmerkar
as a military figure. It's possible that Lugalbanda was just an interim
military governor ruling Uruk, and that the rule of Sumer as a whole
went to Etana in Kish, who is said to have "consolidated all the foreign
countries". Although his reign has yet to be archaeologically attested,
his name is found in later legendary tablets, and Etana is sometimes
regarded as the first king and founder of Kish himself.
Etana has been a Nimrod candidate on some websites I've visited. The Evidence for Enmerkar far outweighs the evidence for Etana in my view. But maybe it's not impossible Etana and Enmerkar are the same person simply known by different names in different cities. But for now my working theory is that they are different people.
Etana
could easily have been one of Cush's other sons, and the brother of
Nimrod, creating possible parallels to Set overthrowing Osiris in
Egyptian mythology, and many other myths about a a tyrant becoming King
by killing his brother to latter be avenged by his brother's son. Zababa
was the name of the patron deity of Kish, which makes Sabtah or
Sabtecha seem the likely candidates to me.
The next King of Uruk
was Dumuzid, who's name is another form of Tammuz. Modern mythology makes him the
Son of Nimrod and likely an inspiration for figures like Osiris and/or Horus, I'm skeptical of all that, but it could fit here. Dumuzid
was captured by Enmebaragesi of Kish, the earliest ruler on the kings-list whose
name is attested directly from archaeology. So we are at the dawn of
recorded history now.
There are two Dumuzids on the Kings-list.
The Antediluvian one is who the Tammuz myths are usually attributed to.
But I believe that's because of Confusion, while I do think some real
Pre-Flood history may be remembered in the myths associated with the
Antediluvian Sumerian Kings, I believe this was the only real Dumuzid.
The Tammuz myths are clearly heavily mythologized and harder to identify with
history anyway, because they revolve around Inanna. But in part I feel
this comes from this Dumuzid's relationship with the High Priestess of
Inanna, who's Temple was in Uruk, and the sacred Marriage ritual that was key to the religion of Uruk. I suspect the same thing about
Inanna's role in the Gilgamesh legends. Indeed every other myth about Inanna is known to be about the importance of Uruk.
Dumuzid was succeeded by
Bilgames, more commonly known as Gilgamesh. The "Epic of Gilgamesh" most
commonly refereed to is a much later construction, the earliest actual
Sumerian poems about Bilgames (Which are still well after when he
actually lived) are very different. Enkidu is not a wild-man who needed
to be tamed, he has no origin story, he's just a loyal friend and
partner (and possibly Lover) of Bilgames. Also in the Sumerian poems Bilgames dies first and
it is Enkidu who mourns him.
One of the Bilgames poems lacks a
parallel story in the latter Epic. "Bilgames and Aga", which is
about his conflict with King Aga of Kish, the successor of Enmebaragesi.
Bilgames/Gilgamesh
is sometimes cited as a son of Lugalbanda, but the Sumerian Kingslist
calls him "The Son of Lilu" a phrase often translated Phantom, but also
taken to mean an Incubus (Male Sucubus) and associated with Lilith.
Lilith would in medieval times become the alleged first wife of Adam in
Jewish folklore. But her original Sumerian origin story was as a "Sacred
Prostitute" in the service of Inanna in Uruk. It's possible both names
refer to the same man, or that Bilgames was adopted, or one was his step
father by marriage. Bilgames' mother is always refereed to as the
goddess Ninsun, who I'm simply going to randomly guess was a daughter of
Nimrod.
One of the most noted things about Gilgamesh is his
having traveled to meet the man who built the Ark and survived the
Flood. This event isn't depicted directly in the surviving Sumerian Bilgames
poems, but it is mentioned. In the Sumerian poems the Noah figure is named Ziusudra rather then the more well known Utnapishtim of the later Epic of Gilgamesh.
Noah lived 350 years after The Flood, the
time of Bilgames could very well have been that early after The Flood. If he was a nephew or grandson of Nimrod as I suspect, that would make him the same generation as Eber or Peleg, Peleg actually died before Noah did.
So I feel I have
succeeded in identifying Nimrod's true place in early history. And in so doing connected the first 10 and a half chapters of Genesis with the earliest recorded History.
If you
want to read the Enmerkar and Bilgames Sumerian poems, they are online
including English translations here.
http://etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk/catalogue/catalogue1.htm
I
am well aware this theory has been suggested before (most notably by
David Rohl), I have however added my own new contributions and twists to
it.
No comments:
Post a Comment